Your IFR file, assembled — board-ready with every gap owned.
One fixed-price Sprint — £7,500 +VAT (test) — for a board-ready evidence pack in 3–4 weeks, every gap owned and every exception named. That is roughly 25 hours of a senior solicitor's time, spent once, for assembly instead of hours. Your team's whole job: five answers and one document.
Shown throughout on fictional Harbour Athletic data — no real club record. Prices marked TEST are offer tests, quoted only after a document sample and a short discovery call; solicitor rates are published figures and the hour arithmetic is ESTIMATE.
1 · Start here — five answers, one document
If the IFR application is sitting with two overstretched people, this is the whole ask. Everything after it — chasing, checking, assembling — is our job.
Showing 5 of 5 answers + one document — your whole job.
Prefer the full workspace? Open the evidence inbox — upload, link or request, with per-version notes.
2 · What you get — a pack your board can sign, gaps owned
Narratives, evidence list with version references, open exceptions, review record and sign-off checklist — plus editable registers and a read-only export. The real pack artifact from the seeded demo story (Harbour Athletic (fictional demo club); source: IFR Provisional Licence Application Guidance — Published guidance, version as checked Sep 2026); synthetic render below, live hash-bound snapshot on the review page. Export is not submission — your board approves, you submit, the receipt is recorded.
Governance evidence pack — fixed template v1
Club: Harbour Athletic (fictional demo club)
Generated: 2026-09-18 (synthetic render)
Scoped requirement / evidence summary
See evidence index (version-specific references).
Ownership & control (IFR ownership thresholds)
Fictional Holder Ltd — 75% (checked Sep 2026)
Funding & source of funds (IFR funding disclosure)
3 · What you buy — one reviewed module, one board-reviewable pack
A Sprint ends with one of these — “One reviewed evidence module” or “One board-reviewable pack” — accepted by a named human, decided by your board.
One reviewed evidence module
Supported entity/role map, ownership/personnel facts and draft descriptions inside the agreed perimeter — every unresolved point flagged to a named reviewer, nothing silently settled. Done when the reviewer accepts it, not when the AI drafts it.
Indexed handover/approval pack: narratives, evidence manifest, version-specific references, open exceptions, review record, sign-off checklist, editable registers + read-only export. Done when the club board — not Elite — approves it.
4 · Why it holds up — 390 checks across the actual IFR forms
401 fields across the 8 core IFR forms (playbook: ~390) + 12 live counsel gates (+ 6 proposed, reference-only until counsel sign-off — 18 combined) + every mistake written down as a tracked finding. Counts are live from the product, not slides.
The 8 core IFR forms, counted live. Full corpus: 21 checklists incl. assumptions, governance, sanctions, enforcement mirrors.
Checklist
Fields
Owner
CL-ANNEX-A-PORTAL (M3/F7): Provisional application portal questions (Annex A S1/S2/S3)
Showing 3 of 3 record-of-work issues from the demo story (3 evidence items, 4 queue rows, 2 key dates).
Ground-lease notice deadline: Unknown, not guessed (fictional demo row)
Caught by: Field checklist CL-RULES-GATES + ground-record review.
Trail: EV-101 (fictional lease v3) → ACT-012 owner J. Whitaker → KD-02 stays standing with a file-finding path. Expiry and notice deadline kept as separate fields..
Trail: EV-102 (fictional letter v1) → ACT-015 overdue with S. Okafor → REV-020 in review with N. Rahbar Sato → DEC-003 labelled gap (sufficiency excluded)..
Trail: EV-103 requested from custodian J. Whitaker — display reference only, bytes never fetched, held, or read until the club grants access or uploads a copy..
Live gate states (open/total, never a rating): 12 gates tied to duty rows, e.g. “Serious-criminal-conduct source-of-wealth test” → REQ-OWN-04.
5 · Humans decide — AI drafts, your board approves
Routine assembly rides the AI track — drafts, checks, assembly. Anything needing judgment waits for a named human and stays open with an owner until they clear it. Every AI draft is attributed; nothing counts until a person accepts it.
Named reviewers (fictional demo story)
N. Rahbar Sato — Elite reviewer (evidence + pack verification)
J. Whitaker — Club Secretary (fictional) — custodian + confirmer
S. Okafor — Finance Owner (fictional) — model + funding facts
A. Mensah — Club Sponsor (fictional) — accountable decisions
R. Alvarez — Board Chair (fictional) — governance sign-off
T. Ellis — Supporter Liaison Officer (fictional) — fan evidence
Acceptance
Fictional illustration — not product data: 34 reviews recorded · 31 accepted first pass · 3 returned with what-to-fix + due date. Shows what 'AI drafts, humans decide' means: every AI draft needs a named-human accept before it counts. Real acceptance data only after paid delivery.
Offer figures are TESTS (quoted only after a document sample + discovery). Solicitor/account figures are ACTUALS per W7 market/pricing. Day/hour arithmetic is ESTIMATES.
Sprint £7,500 +VAT (test) vs solicitor-day-rate math
We are Arash Shahrokhi and Navid Rahbar Sato, the founders of Elite. At Dentons, we personally implemented board and committee processes and risk registers and led ownership and source-of-funds due diligence. This is a new sector practice for us — we do not claim previous UK-football mandates. We never show scores or verdicts; the IFR decides licences, we assemble the evidence, and work needing a solicitor goes to a specialist.